The conceptual penis as a social construct

My cmnt: The conceptual penis as a social construct was actually published here in Cogent Social Sciences. It was sent to these deranged Leftists as legitimate research by two writers simply wanting to demonstrate that completely off-the-wall, zany, gobbledygook is easily mistaken, even by so-called experts, for real-world science. I publish just page one here because you probably wouldn’t believe it otherwise.

My cmnt: Taken from an article by By Peter W. Wood JUNE 1, 2017 – for The Federalist – here is an explanation:

A different mathematician and different philosopher teamed up to write and publish an article in an academic journal in which they hoaxed both radical feminists and global warming true-believers. Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay, using pseudonyms and bogus references, published in the journal Cogent Social Sciences their article, “The Conceptual Penis as a Social Construct,” in which they blamed the “conceptual penis” for causing “climate change and raping empty spaces through ‘manspreading.’” The hoax occasioned outrage from many who thought it an unfair attack on the field of gender studies.

One thought on “The conceptual penis as a social construct

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s