Federal health authorities scorn ivermectin for COVID, despite findings of benefits, safety

FDA warns against Nobel Prize-winning medication in wisecracking tweet: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” 

By Bethany Blankley – Sept 20, 2021 – for Just the News

My cmnt: Why have the democrats lied about the efficacy of HCQ and Ivermectin to treat Covid-19? That is the question to the “crime of the century”. Among possible answers is the need for the godless democrats to create a crisis as an excuse to trample our constitutional rights and throw an election. They are making unimaginable money off the vaccines vs the extremely low cost of HCQ and Ivermectin. This artificially created democrat crisis is also an excuse for borrowing and spending trillions and trillions of dollars to get what they want in other areas besides buying votes by throwing unnecessary money at the working and middle classes. Democrats simply hate people and the more deaths they can cause (such as the 60 million murdered babies as they worship Satan through sexual rites and the sacrament of abortion) by denying these therapeutics to the masses the better. President Trump rightly notified the public about these highly effective therapeutics so they must demagogue them to prevent any good accruing to Trump.

My cmnt: Democrats also simply hate America and the Constitution. They have loved the most evil system of government ever devised by man, i.e., communism. FDR loved Joe Stalin and gave Eastern Europe away to the evil empire. Woodrow Wilson was a Leftist and communist sympathizer. The democrats tried to lose the Korean War and managed to lose the Vietnam War as they hated President Nixon so much they would not allow his victory over communism to stand. They still to this day love Castro and Che. They love and admire communist China as they used to love and admire the Soviet Union. Communism is responsible for at least 100 million deaths and the enslavement and misery of billions. So why not want Covid-19 to continue the carnage?

In an effort to dissuade people from taking Ivermectin to treat COVID-19, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been running public service announcements and radio ads nationwide. A group of doctors and researchers argue clinical trials show it is effective against treating COVID-19, and others point out the Nobel-prize winning drug has been safe for human use for over 20 years.

In its consumer update, accompanied by a photo of a woman dressed in scrubs walking next to a horse, the FDA states, “Clinical trials assessing ivermectin tablets for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in people are ongoing.”

The advisory doesn’t warn against taking the drug but taking it for COVID-19 and taking the veterinary version. 

“If your health care provider writes you an ivermectin prescription, fill it through a legitimate source such as a pharmacy, and take it exactly as prescribed,” the FDA update advises. “Never use medications intended for animals on yourself or other people. Animal ivermectin products are very different from those approved for humans. Use of animal ivermectin for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19 in humans is dangerous.” 

The same image with a horse was posted on Twitter by the FDA, accompanied by a folksy warning against taking the drug: “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” 

The FDA approved Ivermectin created by Merck & Co., Inc. Oct. 8, 1998 for use in humans to treat infections caused by roundworms. Its inventors received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for its discovery in 2015, with the announcement noting its “consequences in terms of improved human health and reduced suffering are immeasurable.”

In the more than 20 years that ivermectin has been administered to people, the FDA and other federal agencies have never issued a warning related to the drug causing serious injury, toxicity or death.

The Center for Disease Control’s Overseas Refugee Health Guidance lists safe and effective vaccinations and medications to be given to U.S.-bound refugees, including Ivermectin, citing research dating to 2000. All Middle Eastern, Asian, North African, Latin American, and Caribbean refugees “should receive presumptive therapy,” including Albendazole and Ivermectin, it states, excluding pregnant women and children under a certain weight and height.

A 2020 report published by the U.S. National Library of Medicine suggests that the drug is effective in treating COVID-19 in the early stages of the virus. It states that “ivermectin inhibits the replication of viruses in vitro” and its “antiviral mode of action suggests an inhibitory effect on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in the early stages of infection.” However, it notes, “Currently, evidence on efficacy and safety of ivermectin for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 treatment is conflicting.” 

The study resulted in several Indian provinces using ivermectin as a prophylactic and treatment for COVID-19 in mid-2020.

Roughly one year later, in a study published by the American Journal of Therapeutics, researchers argued Ivermectin has an “established safety profile through decades of use” and “could play a critical role in suppressing or even ending the SARS-CoV2 pandemic.” They evaluated the results of Ivermectin tested in 24 randomized controlled clinical trials involving 3,406 participants, assessing its efficacy in reducing mortality and secondary outcomes in people with, or at high risk of COVID-19.

They found that Ivermectin’s antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties were beneficial and that it reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin in COVID-19 patients by an average of 62% (risk ratio .38%). They also found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%).

“Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin,” they concluded. “Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.”

Likewise, Dr. Tess Lawrie, director of Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd., who consults with the World Health Organization, said, “We have an incredibly positive and uplifting message to share: ivermectin treats and prevents COVID and it is the key to unlocking the never-ending cycle of pandemic peaks and personal restrictions and will help restart economies.” 

An organization she has partnered with, Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), has been calling for widespread adoption of ivermectin as a prophylactic and treatment of all phases of COVID-19. FLCCC president Dr. Pierre Kory, former professor of medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, testified before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs last December and before the NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel Jan. 6 on the benefits of the drug to treat COVID-19.

FLCC also analyzed the findings from 27 studies on the effects of ivermectin and found that it “demonstrates a strong signal of therapeutic efficacy” against COVID-19. As a result, its doctors maintain, “The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.” 

The group also published a database of the results of 113 ivermectin COVID-19 studies, including 73 peer reviewed, 63 with results comparing treatment and control groups. Of the 63 controlled studies, the data shows a 69% improvement among patients for early treatment. The 63 trials involved 613 scientists and 26,398 patients in 31 randomized controlled trials. 

Summaries of other studies include 86% improvement in 14 prophylaxis trials, 69% improvement in 27 early treatment trials, 40% improvement in 22 late treatment trials, and 60% improvement in 31 randomized controlled trials.

Despite this, the NIH maintains that “no clinical trials have reported a clinical benefit for ivermectin in patients with these viruses,” while at the same time acknowledging, “Some studies of ivermectin have also reported potential anti-inflammatory properties, which have been postulated to be beneficial in people with COVID-19.”

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Kentucky), one of the few physicians in Congress, recently told constituents that the government hasn’t prioritized researching ivermectin for political reasons. 

“The hatred for Trump deranged these people so much, they’re unwilling to objectively study it,” said Paul,  the Cincinnati Enquirer reported. “So someone like me that’s in the middle on it, I can’t tell you because they will not study ivermectin. They will not study hydroxychloroquine without the taint of their hatred for Donald Trump.”

Others have hypothesized financial motives at work. 

“The overall market for COVID-19 drugs and vaccines is projected to peak this year at $67 billion, drop to $61 billion in 2022,” BioSpace.com reports. It notes that the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections cost governments between $19.50 and $37.00 per dose, excluding cooling and storage costs. 

A 2018 WHO report cited a direct cost of $2.90 for 100 12-mg tablets of Ivermectin. A 2020 report cites a cost between 60 cents and $1.80 for a 5-day course of ivermectin.

2 thoughts on “Federal health authorities scorn ivermectin for COVID, despite findings of benefits, safety

  1. To the average ten-year-old reading a summary book of history, you can’t see the distinction between good and bad. But at the judgement day the threads of history previously appearing grey due to the intertwined resolution of black and white will crystalize and assemble into wickedness and righteousness, and it will become plain.

    There exists true good and absolute evil. What people call ‘good’, if not aligned to the source of truth, necessarily contains some good and some evil, and importantly, there exists good which is outside of their definition. Why is this so important? If the kernel of truth is outside what a man finds ‘good’, he is then calling it ‘evil’. The same applies in reverse for the partitioning of evil. After this, again, the inverse analysis of both confirms the same. This leaves us with four logical predicates with four corners each, a firm foundation through which to test the world, the heart, and the hidden things of mystery. Since the kernel of truth has already been revealed in Jesus Christ, there is no longer any excuse for informed ambivalence. Only love and hatred remain: either to love the truth and hate wickedness, or to hate the truth and love wickedness.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s