What’s the meaning of the phrase ‘Beyond the pale’?

Published on

in

To be ‘beyond the pale’ is to be unacceptable; outside agreed standards of decency.

What’s the origin of the phrase ‘Beyond the pale’?

Firstly, let’s get the spelling clear here. It’s ‘beyond the pale‘ and not ‘beyond the pail‘ – the phrase has nothing to do with buckets.

The everyday use of the word ‘pale’ is as an adjective meaning whitish and light in colour (used to that effect by Procol Harum and in countless paint adverts).

Beyond the pale

However, there is another meaning of ‘pale’ – ‘a stake or pointed piece of wood’. This meaning is now virtually obsolete except as used in this phrase. A variant of it – ‘paling’, is still in use, as in paling fence and ‘impale’ (as in Dracula movies).

The paling fence is significant as the term ‘pale’ came to mean the area enclosed by such a fence and later just figuratively ‘the area that is enclosed and safe’. So to be ‘beyond the pale’ was to be outside the area accepted as ‘home’.

Catherine the Great created the Pale of Settlement in Russia in 1791. This was the name given to the western border region of the country, in which Jews were allowed to live. The motivation behind this was to restrict trade between Jews and native Russians. Some Jews were allowed to live, as a concession, ‘beyond the pale’.

Pales were enforced in various other European countries for similar political reasons, notably in Ireland (the Pale of Dublin) and France (the Pale of Calais, which was formed as early as 1360).

The phrase itself originated later than that. The first printed reference comes from 1657 in John Harington’s lyric poem The History of Polindor and Flostella. In that work, the character Ortheris withdraws with his beloved to a country lodge for ‘quiet, calm and ease’, but they later venture further:

“Both Dove-like roved forth beyond the pale to planted Myrtle-walk”.

Such recklessness rarely meets with a good end in 17th century verse and before long the lovers are attacked by armed men with ‘many a dire killing thrust’. The message is clear – ‘if there is a pale, decent people stay inside it’, which conveys exactly the figurative meaning of the phrase as it is used today.

As a corresspondent has helpfully pointed out, although Harington’s poem was published in 1657, he died in 1612. That date, and most probably some years earlier, has to be the ‘not later than’ date for the origin of ‘beyond the pale’.

From the website phrases.org.uk

4 responses to “What’s the meaning of the phrase ‘Beyond the pale’?”

  1. […] My cmnt: I must also note once again that the lockdown of 2020 and 2021 were highly selective (i.e., politically determined). Either you entirely lockdown a country or you do not (and of course even if you do you only delay the inevitable). Keeping the Walmarts of the world open while shuttering and destroying millions of small businesses and jobs and sending “essential” workers to work (and thus exposed to Covid) while demanding millions stay home and then borrowing trillions to buy them off – was evil and wickedness almost beyond understanding. But then the party of slavery (i.e., the democrats) has always demonstrated evil and wickedness beyond the pale. […]

    Like

  2. apocalypse2blog Avatar

    Check out the Pale of Settlement. My interest has been in identifying the pale horse of the Apocalypse. This is very telling.

    Like

  3. Ilya Avatar
    Ilya

    Catherine II was a modern Athaliah, doing a great many wicked things – like annulling the law and delaying the promised freedom of the serfs for a century, adultering and murdering her husband, destroying the Orthodox church and theiving their lands, and destablizing the southern border by making peace with the Turks. That she mistreated the Jews is but another line in her character assessment.

    Like

    1. Lord Buckbeak Avatar

      Thank you for reading and writing. It is a sad fact of history that the Russian czars (so interesting that FDR and every president since have appointed senior officials popularly known as ‘czars’), unlike the other monarchies in Europe, refused to relinquish any power to elected representatives and so paved the way for the communist revolution and 100 years of misery, poverty and enslavement of the Russian people. A BIG lesson of history: Stop mistreating the Jews – it always ends badly for those who do.

      Like

Leave a comment